Blogging Idol 2: Back to the Drawing Board


blogging idol

Update: Thanks for the feedback guys. Looks like the new rules are good to go, so we will be running the competition on November. Next Monday (October 27) I will be posting the final post and opening the applications.

I thought I had the perfect plan for Blogging Idol 2, but the events proved me wrong. I figured that an AdSense based competition would really be cool, since we all want to understand what are the best, real methods for making money with PPC ads right?

It might be the case, but it turns out that very few people were be willing to start a new blog or website for that purpose (and the ones who did were worried about getting their account banned if other competitors tried to sabotage them). Over the past week I received only 20 applications. Probably some more would come over the next week, but it would still be below the minimum number for making the competition worthwhile for the readers or for the sponsors.

So that is idea is canceled.

At this point I have two options, just drop Blogging Idol 2 for now, or try to launch with another set of rules.

I was thinking something that would let you guys use your existing blogs, be funny, and yet fair. Frankly, it was hard finding the answer. Most types of competition are too easy to cheat, and I can already foresee the bitching that will come along with it.

One idea that I had:

Make the competition based on 4 parameters:

  • RSS increase
  • Technorati authority increase
  • A voting session where readers would vote for their favorite competitor
  • A judge panel (with 3 experts) that would award 3 votes for their favorite competitors

So in total there would be 6 points to be won (3 from the judges, and 3 from each other parameter). After the four weeks, the blogger with the highest number of points would be the Blogging Idol and win the $4,000 in prizes.

Even if someone tries to cheat on one of the parameters, therefore, it would not compromise the competition, and it could even backlash for the cheater because people would talk about it and it would affect the voting from the readers and from the judges.

What do you guys think?

Let me know if you would be participating if we used those rules. If enough people express interest we might end up running it. The $4,000 in prizes are still there after all.

Browse all articles on the Blog Projects category

61 Responses to “Blogging Idol 2: Back to the Drawing Board”

  • Umar in Dubai

    those are good rules… but i suggest u move the competition to jan since nov and dec are busy months with holidays and all

  • Ryan Wanger

    Love the new rules. I was really excited about participating this year, but the old rules made it a no-go.

    Looking forward to a fun competition!

  • Jodith

    Hahahahahaha….I have about 25 rss subscribers…I don’t think I’ll have a problem qualifying.

    I do like this competition, because increasing subscribers is one of my goals, although I think a lot of my energy in the next week or so is going to go toward a new newsletter. Then again, maybe I’ll make my newsletter subscriber tease into an RSS one instead.

    So, yeah, I’ll sign up. I’m not likely to win, but it’ll be a good incentive to do some of the promotional work I’ve been avoiding.

  • Franklin Bishop

    So where do we apply for this at? Because I am totally in for competition. It doesn’t matter if you lose because with these four parameters you will be improving your blog anyways. And that is what you should be doing, improving your blog.

  • Jagdesh

    I agree with everything except for the Technorati authority increase.Not everyone uses technorati(such as me:()and i am sure with three critriea it is enought to choose the winner

  • Daniel Scocco

    @Sohail, yeah we are running it. I will post the final post and open applications on Monday.

  • Sohail

    So any thing finalized Daniel?

  • Brian

    Alright well whatever you choose to do Daniel, I’ll go along with it. Really it’s just an opportunity to motivate me to blog and grow my site.

    I’ll be looking forward to what happens now.

  • AnotherGuy


    Great minds, eh? I guess this will be a tough one to win if there are others with the enthusiasm that you have. 🙂

  • Money Making Ideas ~ Suzanne

    OMG! AnotherGuy just beat me to it! This is almost verbatim to what I was just drafting to comment here! Do I think I’ll win Blogging Idol? Chances are NOT in my favor … but I know it will motivate me so much that I will succeed at my blog!

    I can’t think of a single thing you could do for Blogging Idol that would make it an even playing field or “fair” … the more experience someone has, the more subscribers someone has, the more “connnected” someone is … the better they’ll do … but for me … even if I fall short I will still be winner.

    “Aim for the moon,even if you miss it, you’ll become one of the stars.”

    *SmiLes* Suzanne

    I’m ready … bring it!

  • Daniel Scocco

    @Young, I have sponsors giving out money for the contest. Running a competition with 20 people would not be worth to them (and to me neither).

    I try many things on this blog. Some work, others don’t. That is how it goes.

  • Young

    I think you should stick with the rule you first decided, though it was not a perfect way, and there may be cheat or sabotage. Game is game, everyone is equal in the rule settled and accepted by each other.

    You change the contest today, and you maybe cancelled the contest tomorrow, which meant that you did not keep your word. I don’t think it is a good idea.

  • Mr. I

    1. I don’t think RSS is good idea. Some people (you know whom I speak of) may again say that the competition is not fair. But it is good that it is not most important factor!

    2. Technorati Authoraty would be a good parameter. But again, link exchanges may kill whole idea. And as in one of the comments, 10000 people = more links than 10 people reading the same article.

    3. Voting! Not good at all. People may write good stories about why they need $4000 ( I bet voting will bring the news of 100’s of family members suffering cancer or something like that ) to win sympathy of people. This will be a whole lot unfair.

    4. Experts! Best idea!

  • Ali Hale (from Alpha Student)

    Hi Daniel,

    I really like this new version — I was not at all keen to try to create a new site, and my goals at the moment are readership rather than income!

    So long as we can use an existing site (I want to use Alpha Student), I’d be in 🙂

  • Daniel Scocco

    @AnotherGuy, yeah that is more like the spirit of it 🙂 .

  • AnotherGuy

    I’m starting to think that it shouldn’t really matter if people are already experienced in blogging or not. I’ve only had my blog up for 3 months and have learned a lot already. I would probably end up joining this whether or not I like the new rules (I’ve done some thinking since yesterday) and just do it to learn.

    This isn’t necessarily about who is the most experienced going in, but who is the most passionate and excited to be excellent. It’s about who gains the most experience, and who comes to understand the process.

    Those of us that read this blog are here to become better bloggers. I can only see this as a way to enhance our blogging abilities… and so I am a bit encouraged to tell everyone here they should sign-up so that they can better themselves.

    That’s just my two-cents.

  • Daniel Scocco

    @Rasrt, I might put a limit on the size of the blogs that can participate.

    I am thinking 1,000 or 2,000 RSS readers max.

  • Rarst


    Quality content is extremely important but awesome article that got read by 10000 people will probably receive more links than awesome article read by 10. 🙂

    I can’t decide if participating worth it… So count me in. 🙂 It’s always better to do something than to stay out.

  • TechZoomIn

    Its better you write a article covering all the rules and possible ways to increase that respective counts 🙂

  • Daniel Scocco

    @SEO Genius, yeah that is the case.

    @TechZooming, Technorati authority is nothing more than the number of links from other blogs.

    You don’t even need to focus on it, it happens naturally.

  • SEO Genius

    I much prefer that idea I am sorry the other idea was not taken up by as many people but most including myself would prefer to work hard on their current blog to try and make that one a success first.

    Persistance is the answer to success.

    One thing I wanted to make sure is that this competition could be used on my current blog and a new blog wouldn’t have to be made?

  • TechZoomIn

    Hi Daniel,

    Rules are good but it would be great if your ignore that “Technorati authority increase “.

    Because many of the competitors will be new to blogging and they might not know the tricks and ways to improve that one. As compared to exp people.

    My thumb rule suggestion is: what ever may be the rules you are going to implement, they should be easy to all king of bloggers.starting from fresher to exp guys.

    Apart from this Technorati, all other 3 are pretty cool and transparent.

    What do you say?

  • Daniel Scocco

    @Sohail, directory links do not increase your technorati authority, only links from other blogs.

  • Daniel Scocco

    @Rarst, the best way to gain technorati authority and RSS subscribes is still writing top quality content. Probably will always be.

  • Daniel Scocco

    @Brian, let me clarify your doubts.

    “1. RSS increase. Really, I don’t have too much of a problem with this idea except that this was the whole theme of BI 1.”

    People loved this, hence why I think it is smart to stick with what works.

    “2. Technorati – How would you rate this? By number increase? Because honestly it is so much easier to go from 100,000 to 50,000 than it is to go from 7,500 to 5,000. Some clarification on this would be great.”

    You are confusing technorati authority with rank. What you mentioned is rank. Authority is simply the number of links that you have from other blogs. So increasing this number is the same for everyone.

    “3 & 4. Please, please don’t do voting. Voting gets biased (whether it is intended or not) and there will be tons of controversy over user voting and people buying out votes etc. Just my opinion, but I feel that this competition should be purely quantitative, not qualitative.”

    The voting is required to remove the cheating factor. All quantitative metrics are subject to cheating and manipulation, and on the previous edition there was a lot of bitching already, so this is to avoid that.

    “1. Keep the new website idea, but just don’t use adsense. I know lots of people want to start new sites, they just don’t have the motivation. Why not have participants make a new site and see how many a) new rss subscribers or b) newsletter subscribers they can get.”

    If I kept the new website idea, we would have 25 competitors. Not worth for me or for the sponsors.

    “2. If you, or everyone else, simply doesn’t like the new site idea, then let’s work with our existing sites. Why not try # of newsletter signups? Slightly different from RSS, but still a fun way to compete for readers.”

    Completely easy to cheat, and very difficult to spot the cheaters. What if some guy stays all day creating fake gmail accounts, with real names, and subscribing to his own newsletter?,

  • Tejvan Pettinger

    It is a good idea. There was no incentive to set up a new blog. I’ve started 13 and ended up concentrating on 4. There’s no way I was going to bother with another. But, this competition sounds great.

  • Danny Cooper

    Brilliant idea Daniel, much improved over the last one. I’d love to enter with the new rule set.

  • Ruchir Chawdhry

    Yeah, the adsense one is too easy to manipulate, there are many clicking programs available on the ‘net (and Google doesn’t ban you THAT quickly). Another problem with the previous one was that it was with new blogs. Most people are focusing on their primary blogs and don’t want to divert their attention away from it…

    I really like the current one. Though I think it’d be better if you set some limits in place so, for example blogs with over 2,000 readers can’t take part (because if you just make the contest a free-for-all then it’ll be a disadvantage for smaller bloggers as it’s easier to grow your RSS count and backlinks if your blog is popular). Also you should discount paid links.

    As for the readers’ voting session, make the people vote through the comments, and not through a polling plugin as they’re easy to manipulate through proxies. The readers’ voting session will be pretty biased though…

    – The newsletter idea by Brian is pretty good…

    But don’t drop BI 2, I wanted to get in on this one and I’ll definitely sign-up with these rules 😀

  • Rarst

    Definitely better than AdSense idea. Still I am considering…


    discover new blogs
    learn new tricks
    gain some visibility


    except visibility rest of pros don’t really require participating
    blogs from marketing niche will probably have huge natural advantage in skills
    blogs with established traffic (mine is low) will have more leverage
    focusing on promotion means (for me) removing focus from writing content daily

    It’s good idea overall but basically I don’t like being underdog. 🙂 It’s contest, it’s skills based, it’s not skills I am good at. I will think some more, maybe do a post and ask my readers should I dedicate time to participate or stick with what I am doing already.

  • Nags

    Love this idea! Please go forward with it.

Comments are closed.