Do Small Bloggers Have A Chance With Digg?
I visit Digg on a regular basis to vote on stories that I like as well as to find new and interesting information. A few days ago I was reading through the items that were currently listed on the front page of the technology section, and was observing the rich getting richer and smaller bloggers having a difficult time cracking the upper echelon of Digg success.
The Digg voting system is intended to allow the most popular stories to get the most exposure and to prevent users from gaming the system. But one of the results of this system is that it heavily favors blogs and websites with huge audiences while those with smaller audiences are left with much more difficult odds of gaining exposure from Digg.
If you visit the technology section on a consistent basis, you no doubt see many of the same websites and blogs being featured almost daily. These sites consistently publish new content that Digg users appreciate and they have built very large audiences for a reason. Some of those that you’ll see on a regular basis include Ars Technica, Engadget, Gizmodo, TechCrunch, Mashable, Valleywag, Lifehacker, and ReadWriteWeb, among others.
Admittedly, these sites all provide quality, timely articles. However, I can’t help but believe that there are plenty of other deserving stories in the blogosphere. I think most Digg users that visit the technology section already subscribe to most of these blogs, I know I do. In this case, wouldn’t Digg be a more useful resource to users if it introduced them to content sources that they don’t already have in their RSS reader?
At the particular moment that I was on the technology front page, 11 of the 15 stories were from what I would consider to be major players. Ars Technica had four items on the page, and Gizmodo and ReadWriteWeb had two each.
I understand that it’s not Digg’s responsibility to provide bloggers with the opportunity to reach thousands of new readers. Digg’s objective is to show the most popular stories to its visitors. However, as a Digg user, I would like to see more stories on the front page that are new to me and I would like to be able to discover new sources of information. There are thousands of blogs out there that provide quality content that would interest me, but I may never find most of them.
Many of the larger blogs mentioned earlier have such a huge following that only a very small percentage of readers need to digg a story in order to get it to the front page. On the other hand, a smaller blog may need a lot of help to get the necessary votes to reach the front page. The larger blogs often only need to include a Digg button somewhere on the post or in the RSS feed to convert a large subscriber base into a high number of diggs, an advantage that smaller blogs do not have.
So what options does a small blogger have to get to the front page? One option is to build a powerful Digg profile, which can take a lot of time and effort. Digg users with strong profiles (and lots of friends) have better chances of their submissions reaching the front page, but many Digg users frown on someone submitting their own content, so this may not be a great option. Digg’s shout system seems to be largely ineffective, so adding friends and sharing your story probably won’t get you very far either.
I believe this leaves small bloggers with only a few options, some of which Digg itself does not approve. The first method that I have used with occasional success is to create as much traffic as possible with other social media sites and hope that it translates into diggs. Another option is to email friends and contacts with a request for a Digg. This essentially does the same thing as the Digg shout system, except that it may actually work. There are even some groups of Digg users that agree to share their submissions with each other in order to gain more diggs for everyone. Alternatively, you could contact someone with a strong profile and ask them to submit your story. The last option, and one that has gotten many people banned from Digg, is to buy diggs.
What is Your Opinion?
I’d like to hear your thoughts on whether or not small bloggers have a chance with Digg. Do you think Digg would be a more useful resource if it didn’t constantly feature articles from the same sites? Do you have any methods that have worked well for getting diggs for your blog posts?
Browse all articles on the Social Media category or check the recommended articles for you below:
56 Responses to “Do Small Bloggers Have A Chance With Digg?”
Here’s a couple of quotes from other posts relating to this topic:
“SEOMoz found that the top 100 Digg users control 56% of the homepage. More recent statistics show that the top 100 Digg users are responsible for 48% of the content that appears on the home page.”
‘â€œSex With Robots? Not so far off says authorâ€œ After seeing this story get 524 Diggs in less than 24 hours, I now believe there is use for the term â€œflaming geek.â€”
Has Digg been Dugg??
What social networks show is that people control the information. But Digg is controlled by big brothers instead of small bloggers.
I agree that it’s indeed difficult to see past the same old stuff on the Digg home page. I’d love to see more varied content, but as long as it’s all a big popularity contest, it’s not going to happen.
I wonder if Digg could set up a different section that excludes the “power players” just for something new? That way those of us who want a more varied sampling of what else is out there can see some random blogs.
But then again, maybe that’s what StumbleUpon is for :/
Watch closely. Something is going to happen to Digg.
I have a new blog, and well, digg only helped me once, but it was hard to get diggs, so only one of my articles went to google’s first page, it brought me some visitors, it was good I have to say!
I feel Digg is completely unimportant to me. I even took the FeedBurner “Digg This!” flare off my site – I don’t WANT Diggs, don’t want Diggers – by and large they are just a bunch of useless flybys why read hastily in their urgency to do lots of “digging” today, and who are easily influenced by whatever the first Digg comment says – if that was inaccurate, most of the rest will barely skim and just go by whatever that person said.
Don’t need ’em, don’t want ’em. All they do is tie up your bandwidth like a flock of locusts landing in a field.. and just as quickly, they are gone..
I run a small blog, and I got dugg the other day. I also feel because I run a smaller blog that more people criticize it, because they don’t know it as being a huge honest blog, just because they have never seen it before. I hate looking at Digg comments, they are just so mean. Anyway, the way I got dugg, is I twittered it. Once I twitter it, a few people digg it, I get in the “Hot in Apple” and “Hot in Technology” sections, where more people see the story. Then, after a while, I hit the front page.
I do believe its completely unfair to smaller bloggers like myself, so I like to use Mixx.com, which provides more features than Digg, has a nicer community, and well, doesn’t require that many votes to get to the front. However, Mixx just doesn’t give you the thrill of “The Digg Effect” (which when you are hosted on (mt) you hardly feel at all, because your site stays online ;-).
I prefer to watch the ‘new’ news story and also follow an rss of my own search queries that I find interesting. Forget the front page- I can see that on the net or in mainstream news 2 days from now.
- The Digg Experiment
I agree with everyone saying Digg is not essential for building a successful site. There is one thing you can’t deny though, Digg is a very useful tool to get attention and backlinks to your best pieces.
Mitch at Money News
It looks like there’s more and more of the bigger sites getting banned from Digg though, Copyblogger being of of the recent ones. I think people are starting to think exactly this already, and these sites will start disappearing from their pages.
I have to agree with the above poster regarding the Digg in the SERPs too. A digg can gain ranks among the search engine, and outrank your own post on a topic. It also shows up in Google’s blogsearch listing under its relevant keywords within minutes of being dugg as well.
I think Digg has really moved away from the original idea that it was founded on. It seems like the only way you get a front page digg is if you are a bigger site or pay for diggs on a article.
Its sad because it was founded on the idea of user picked content got to the front but they say only 60% of the digg user base is deciding what is on the front page and its all from same group of sites.
Some one who is just starting a blog like me or has a growing blog is not going to be on the front page without spending a lot of money for people to digg a article for them.
I think that for many bloggers, especially smaller ones, they seem to think that the purpose of Digg is to drive traffic. When I first made the front page, I got 20,000 hits in about 6 hours when I would have normally got 200 hits in a day. Pretty cool, but not really the point.
The Digg model is to present content that people either “dig” – the old-fashioned way of saying, “Hey, that’s cool. I dig it” – or they don’t. That’s it. Yes/No. Dig/Don’t. So many people seem to think there’s more to the model. The inherent flaw of this system is that the entire of human socialization is based on a much more eloquently stated version of “do what the cool kids do.” Not only is it not a democracy, it’s often not a meritocracy either.
In any social voting capacity – from choosing which bar you’ll go to tonight to electing the next president – the more friends you have, the more people you have on your side, the better you’ll fare. Such is life.
My husband suggested an A-Listers portion of the site where the big guns could go and play. That way you end up with two separate playing fields. The thing is, though, I doubt the majority of heavy Digg users want that. They want to be able to go on their Bury Brigades and they want their best-friends-forever at Gizmodo to be the very bestest and most popular site ever.
Carla at WordPlay
I recently found there’s a much more important reason to be on Digg than just the chance of being on the front page. I submitted a story that got absolutely no attention from Diggers, yet the Digg listing for that story went straight to the number 2 position in Google within a day. Last I checked, it was still there.
I too was disillusioned with Digg, but when I saw how it gave my story Google exposure it wouldn’t have had, I was impressed.
I think that if you focus on your own content, rather than building a Digg community, you’ll most certainly win out in the end.
I’ve used Digg on the odd occasion, and it has certainly driven traffic my way, but for the most part that traffic is very short-lived, and if you’re serious about blogging, you’ll cater more for your long term readers (your subscribers).
Interesting post though, Steven. Thanks for piecing it together.
I believe the value of Digg totally depends on your niche. If you are in a newsy niche then there is value. If you are in a content type niche the value is severely reduced.
For me, the time invested is not worth the ROI. But, that does not stop me from wanting to hit the front page of Digg. I am just not going to go out my way to do so. If I get a natural Digg wave excellent, if not I don’t want to play.
Why are you even wasting your time with Digg? I guess I never really saw its value, because since the beginning its been a corrupt popularity contest. Use search engines to find sites that you trust and favor the information from and then subscribe, how hard is that?
Eric Atkins: That’s exactly what I had in my mind. Perhaps, Digg can ask us to upload our OPML file and exclude those stories from their frontpage.
I don’t like the idea of Digg being acquired by Google.
Agree. My opinion that the full time bloggers has a high chance to stand-up in digg frontpage compare to part time blogger. Do you agree? Anyway, I haven’t start to use digg yet. 🙂
“Wouldnâ€™t Digg be a more useful resource to users if it introduced them to content sources that they donâ€™t already have in their RSS reader?”
That thought blew my mind. That’s what I want out of DIGG.
For me DIGG tends to have: stuff already in my RSS reader + popular stuff from REDDIT.
I’ve made the switch to REDDIT because it gets the news before DIGG and it’s usually news that I wouldn’t get ordinarily. I quit using DIGG once I realized that most of the content that I really cared about was already in my RSS reader. REDDIT covers the rest.
I agree with the statement, “wouldnâ€™t Digg be a more useful resource to users if it introduced them to content sources that they donâ€™t already have in their RSS reader?” I think you are on to something here.
What we small fish need is for a major feed reader provider like Google to acquire Digg. Then Google could tie Digg and Google user ids together. Once that is done, they could build in a system to lessen the Digg vote strength from those users who are subscribed via the Google Reader.
jen_chan, writer SureFireWealth.com
You present a very good point. Do small bloggers stand a chance? I myself have noticed that the list (most especially in marketing and technology) is mainly dominated by the same names. Not to say that they don’t deserve their position but I think there are other blogs out there who may have a more interesting point of view to share. But I guess that’s the challenge for them.
I agree with you. About a year ago, I was a great fan of Digg, but they I found the stories boring because I already read them in my feed reader. Gradually, I stopped visiting Digg.
Maybe, it’s time for Digg to change their algorithm. Perhaps, make it harder for the top blogs to appear on the front page. What are your thoughts over this?
I’m relatively new to Digg having never really bothered with it previously. I agree that people should not submit their own content, but out of wishing to try and learn about Digg I submitted a post from another site of mine yesterday – my first Digg submission.
Within 20 minutes it was off the ‘upcoming’ section of the relevant category, and within an hour it had received one Digg and one comment – nothing more.
I need to play around with Digg more, because I’m curious if the post would have had different results if I had posted at a different time of the day…perhaps when the US was awake and not while they were mostly sleeping. I think this probably has a weighting on whether or not the story is picked.
I feel sites that aren’t as popular will probably be better for the small time blogger. Using something such as plime.com instead of Digg would probably give more visitors, allowing them to build up a following a lot easier than they would via Digg.
your article is excellent and to the point … when i was new on digg i submitted a few post from my own blog and after one of the post reached the front page i wasnt able to submit another post after that cause all the major player’s as u say have reported my site as spam and get me kicked out of digg… keeping in mind such nuisances happening at digg i have already planned a more better version of digg … which is much transparent than digg and have much better features so everyone can be benefitted through it… as i have seen many blogger’s and very good content website which are banned on digg… it seem there is some major games played by large groups who dont want new sites to come up and destroy their reputation… so they plan to do such things eventually making the smaller blogger with very little or no success to make their blogs on top…
I am a small blogger and I guess chances to get to digg front page !
I did ONE guest post in my life on a bigger blog than mine and it got right to the digg front page with 1100+ diggs when none of the articles on my own blog ever got more than 20 diggs or so !
In all cases I do not want to get dugg ! No pun intended but I think digg traffic is bad and a loss of bandwidth people there seems much more interested in criticism than in real quality. I, on the other hand, believe in stumble, more than 60% of my traffic is stumble traffic and they tend to have a VERY low bounce rate.
I manage to get 2k+ uniques per day 60% of which is from stumble and I don’t even discover my own posts
just my .2$
Great post. I share your oppinion and I can’t see right way for smaller blogs to get Digg first page. And we will see how this story will goes on Dogg. I just submited it. 🙂
I agree that it might be difficult for small bloggers to get featured on Digg. Apart from the “technical” difficulties mentioned ,there is also the wrong perception from digg users (at least those not familiar with blogs) that all the articles come from smaller or personal blogs are spam.
Even if you get the enough number of diggs and traction, therefore, there is always the risk that the “bury brigade” or bury your story just because it is coming from a small blog in the first place.
I haven’t used Digg for about a year. Found it really frustrating in that it does not have a lot of content pertaining to my niche. Personally, I think Digg is just a lot of hype and not really useful to the average person using the internet. Maybe someone can come up with something similar for the average internet user that is looking for information other than tech info.
Excellent post. Digg is no democracy. It’s an oligarchy. Unless a small blogger already has a following, getting to the top of the Digg mountain is pretty impossible. The amount of work and effort it would take to get there for one single entry ultimately wouldn’t really be worth it in terms of time and energy expended because you’d have to turn around and repeat that process several times for it to generate any long lasting results. There are other sites that are better for the little guy.
I agree with you that Digg would be a more indispensable resource if it didn’t constantly feature articles from the same sites. It’s ironic that something that began as a way to turn people on to new sites is actually doing the opposite and reinforcing the status quo.
Thanks for writing about this.
P.S. I Stumbled this post. 🙂
Comments are closed.