Google Changed How It Handles Nofollow (And How It Might Affect Blogs)

by Daniel in 47 Comments — Updated Reading Time: 3 minutes

Background Image

In reality this change happened over one year ago, but only recently it surfaced. Matt Cutts, the head of Google’s Web Spam team, talked about it in the latest SMX event, and soon afterward the whole SEO sphere was commenting. He also wrote a post explaining the whole issue, titled PageRank Sculpting.

Here is a quote from that post that summarizes the change:

So what happens when you have a page with “ten PageRank points” and ten outgoing links, and five of those links are nofollowed? Originally, the five links without nofollow would have flowed two points of PageRank each (in essence, the nofollowed links didn’t count toward the denominator when dividing PageRank by the outdegree of the page). More than a year ago, Google changed how the PageRank flows so that the five links without nofollow would flow one point of PageRank each.

In other words, the usage of the nofollow attribute will still stop the page that is being linked to from receiving PageRank and anchor text value, but the PageRank that is being “saved” with the nofollow links won’t flow to the other links present in the linking page.

According to Matt Cutts, the change was implemented to discourage website owners who were using a technique called PageRank sculpting, which is the process of using the nofollow attribute internally to change the PageRank flow among different pages. The objective is to give more PageRank value to some pages (the ones that sell something, for example) at the expense of less important pages (the Privacy Policy or Terms of Service, for example).

If Google wants to discourage PageRank sculpting, I am fine with that. The problem that I see with the change is that it might affect other types of websites negatively, blogs above all.

Why?

Because now all the links on your comment section are reducing the PageRank that would otherwise flow to your internal pages.

Here is a numerical example to let you understand it. Suppose that you write a super cool post explaining “Why Obama really won the U.S. presidential election.” The post gets some exposure on social media, and it ends up receiving 200 backlinks from other sites and blogs. Let’s assume that, on average, each backlink was carrying 5 points of PageRank, so the total points of PageRank for that post would be 1,000.

Now let’s suppose that you have 20 navigational links on your layout (e.g., the main menu, the categories and a section with popular posts). This means that each of those internal links would carry 50 points of PageRank to other internal pages on your site, which is good.

The problem comes when people start commenting on the post. Let’s say that, given the popularity of the article, it ends up with 150 comments. Each of those comments carries a link to the site of the comment author. Despite being nofollowed, they would still be counted on the PageRank distribution of that page. Now we have 170 outgoing links, so each link receives only 5.9 points of PageRank. Each of your internal links will only pass 5.9 points of PageRank now, and the total points of PageRank that will remain inside your website are 118.

In other words, before Google changed how it handles the nofollow attribute you would have gained 1,000 points of PageRank with that post. With the change, this number is reduced to 118.

And that is just what would happen in one post. What if we consider a blog with 1,000 posts and tens of thousands of comments? Such a blog could be losing a huge amount of PageRank.

Google might do something to fix this problem, but we still got to hear about it.

Is there any solution? Yes, you can either close your comments completely (but I wouldn’t recommend that), or use an iframe or Javascript to host your comments, so that the links to the comment authors won’t be inside your pages. Andy Beard wrote a post on the topic titled Disqus — Why 95% Of Bloggers Should Switch.

If changing to an iframe or Javascript based solution could give a huge PageRank boost to my blog, I will seriously consider it. For the moment, though, I will wait a couple of weeks to see how the debate around the nofollow changes will evolve. I will keep you guys updated if anything new emerges.

Share this article

47 thoughts on “Google Changed How It Handles Nofollow (And How It Might Affect Blogs)”

  1. With the amount of traffic which Google must be going through it still does not translate to much if page points have gone down for everybody. it simply means that now they work in smaller numbers.

    Reply
  2. in fact seems quite unfair and i heard that a couple of month ago (i.e. may 2010) google confirmed this policy, so the debate didn’t go through as it should

    Reply
  3. If a comment doesn’t enrich that particular blog post, why even approve it, in the first place?

    I mean, a comment that adds value to a blog entry doesn’t deserve the editorial trust translated in a dofollow link?

    PageRank isn’t lost in the linking out process. At least not at that degree that your blog faces PR bankruptcy. I see it more like a passed PR.

    Thanks for the disqus heads up! Though I’m not sure I’ll use any time soon :).

    Cheers,
    Cristian

    Reply
  4. While some may not be happy with the change, it is essential for Google to implement some changes. As the web sites/blogs change and people find different ways of trying to “beat the system” Google must do what it can to protect it’s search results.

    I try not to concern myself too much with PageRank. I usually just let PageRank happen as it will.

    Reply
  5. I just knew about it and it is quite confusing for me in improving a page rank, but I think I would do more comment writing to other blogs I like often. Thanks Daniel for the clear description regarding this issue. Wait for the next update:-)

    Reply
  6. I think the change is good. It’s a good way to deter bloggers trying to have the penny and the bun.

    If a page has a link on it, surely it should be giving some credit to the page it’s going to? If not, it’s clearly a paid for link.

    Reply
  7. Yeah, this change really has problem, I think Google PR would be confusing for many of us if this change does work, hope Google does something for it.

    Reply
  8. What im telling is if you know its nofollow blog what is the purpose of commenting on that if your only target is to get a backlink? so stop worrying about will noffolow help my ranking and find some dofollow blogs and comment.

    and let me know too 🙂

    cheers!

    Reply
  9. So this is how it works for google. But what about the other engines. Yahoo seems to take a count for links behind the nofollow tag? There is a serious discount bud anyway they count it for something.

    Reply
  10. Glad for the information; too new to blogging to make a meaningful comment. I will pay attention and act accordingly now that you have made me aware. Thanks!

    Reply
  11. Yeah, this change really has problem, I think Google PR would be confusing for many of us if this change does work, hope Google does something for it.

    Reply
  12. I just knew about it and it is quite confusing for me in improving a page rank, but I think I would do more comment writing to other blogs I like often. Thanks Daniel for the clear description regarding this issue. Wait for the next update:-)

    Reply
  13. This all gets very difficult for the majority of people on the web, the overwhelming majority of people who have web pages and blogs really aren’t all that savvy as to how search engines rank sites and how they punish sites. The problem is that Google doesn’t make it easy for these people to understand what is and isn’t right in terms of SEO, and as a result a lot of quality content written by smart folks just isn’t showing up in the SERPs to be found by the ordinary punter, and we’re all the worse off for it. I look forward to the future when search engines can recognise the difference between quality content and linked content, and pass out the SERP rewards accordingly. Until then, I suppose it remains the due diligence of the website owner to stay informed and act accordingly to whatever the latest rules are.

    Reply
  14. I believe this is Google way of pushing everyone to continue in their link building pursuit particularly for those important web pages.

    Itrs either you dont rely on Google for business or follow their ‘rule’

    Reply
  15. I also read this kind of information somewhere else. for those who really worship pagerank this might be a big concern. but those who just take care of readers or commenters this might not be a big problem. anyway, may it’s time to change, though.

    Reply
  16. >>In other words, before Google changed how it handles the nofollow attribute you would have gained 1,000 points of PageRank with that post. With the change, this number is reduced to 118.

    I totally don’t buy that. Google is a lot smarter than that, they would know that if there’s a lot of traffic and comments on a blog post all of a sudden then they should be rewarding you for that, not penalizing you for that.

    Personally, I think they’re actually changing the value of nofollow links (or links in general) based on the amount of traffic on a page (or how popular the page is at the time).

    Reply
  17. I don’t believe for a second that on 99% of blogging platforms that can’t immediately recognize comments and not count them at all in their algo. Penalizing (which it essentially amounts to) for users engaging in your website is completely against everything they are moving towards.

    I for one am not going to give a bunch of behavioral toolbar metrics to some other URL in an iFrame, or attempt to block outbound URL’s with javascript (which they can normally read anyway).

    Keep your blog natural looking and focus on engaging your user base and forget whatever FUD google is throwing around now.

    Reply
  18. @Steven Sanders

    Switching to Disqus was a hard decision, and not necessarily permanent. I might well fall into the 5% of bloggers long-term if Disqus don’t make significant improvements.
    Don’t forget I was one of the primary original supporters of dofollow – the primary reason for switching isn’t for my own benefit, but that of the majority of readers who may do the same.

    I am quite capable of mitigating the detrimental effect of 100s of dofollow comments on a blog, or any changes to Google’s handling of nofollow, but I doubt 95% of my readers can (even among the professional SEOs, WP programmers etc)

    Reply
  19. Google should be smart enough to figure out what’s a comment and what’s regular post/link structure. Wouldn’t doubt that they devalue comment links in their algorithms and push that PageRank elsewhere.

    Would entirely screw up their ranking system if they didn’t as sites with lost of comments would lose PR and be ranked lower (which would be bad for them, since sites with lots of comments are usually quality sites).

    Reply
  20. @Nicholas, no worries, not your fault 🙂 .

    Yeah the purpose of the nofollow attribute on blog comments is to both discourage spammers, and protect yourself in the case a spammer posts a link back to his spammy site.

    If you don’t use the nofollow and many of your comment links start pointing to spammy sites, Google could penalize you.

    Reply
  21. Sorry Daniel about your loss of page rank then. So what then is the primary benefit of using nofollow if that is now the case? Is it just to discourage comment spam?

    Reply
  22. I simply don’t get Google. Even their SE algorithms are very much unpredictable. No wonder my PR is swinging back, up and down!

    Reply
  23. Wtf.. are they retard….

    Commenting is the most important part og blogging.. we just can’t stop / disable comments.

    Hope they will do something about it… looking forward for update.

    Thnx…

    Reply
  24. I learned a lot in this article. I don’t know enough to have a conversation about it yet, but my awareness at level 10 now. My blog isn’t going to be effected yet but I’m going to keep this in mind and watch… just like you guys are.

    Reply
  25. @Max, yeah if you don’t plan to use iframe or Javascript I agree using dofollow is the way to go, at least the PageRank won’t go wasted.

    Even if Google can follow iframe and Javascript links, though, using a solution like Disqus will help because in theory there will be only 1 link in your HTML code. Take a look at the source code of a blog that uses Disqus and you will understand.

    Reply
  26. @Rarst, PageRank is only one of the factors being considered to determine search rankings, yes, but it is not a tiny part of it by any means.

    On the example I used in the post, you can see that in certain situations this change might lead a certain post to lose 90% of its PageRank value. This could definitely have an impact on your search rankings, and thus on organic traffic.

    Reply
  27. @Nicholas, yeah that is right, by posting a comment you are reducing the amount of PageRank that would flow to my internal pages.

    What is worse, you are not even gaining that PageRank to your own blog. It is just being “wasted,” or going to a void.

    Reply
  28. @Missy, yes Disqus is bases on Javascript, so in the HTML code of your page you will just see 1 javascript link, instead of dozens of comment links.

    Reply
  29. For those blogs which readers like most, like this type of blog, you don’t need to have the google search. they will type your site directly in the browser.

    Reply
  30. I remember same source sharing that PR is only tiny part of Google equation. 🙂

    Really. Professional SEO people might be obsessed with that but I see no reason bulk of bloggers should care this much about PR.

    I am clueless in SEO, never paid much attention to link practices and openly against nofollow. My blog has PR 4 in the end. Good? Bad? I don’t think I really care as long as visitors from Google are coming.

    Reply
  31. It’s interesting that this happened more than a year ago and no-one had figured it out. On my main blog (sig), I use dofollow to get more comments, so effectively right now, the flow of page rank from my site is no worse off than those that are using nofollow links. I.e. I don’t waste that pr, I pass it to my readers. yet I get 100’s of comments just because people comment to get backlinks. I may look at disqus though.

    Reply
  32. Pagerank is very important but so many bloggers have been extremely successful without it.

    Which only shows that it really doesn’t matter as long as you’ve got the determination to really try to build your blog with creative and amazing content.

    Personally, I’ll leave my comments just the way they are. I’ll not make any sacrifices of my commentators out of greed for myself.

    Reply
  33. Daniel you forgot the biggest alternative of all, just allow your blog to go “dofollow”.

    Google also has stated that it can now follow and interpret JS and iFrames even passing PageRank (I have seen this on client sites for some time now).

    If you are diligent with cleaning out your spam comments dofollow might increase commenting and increase the link love.

    Reply
  34. Hmm…good information, as a nofollow blogger i still need next information about this. I have pagerank 3 and it is enough to get more tasks from paid to review broker. But, because of google changed its pagerank method, i will often monitor the pagerank changing. Thanks Daniel

    Reply
  35. So am I stealing some of your page rank points just by leaving you a comment here? I suppose that I am. Anyways, thanks for making this concept very clear to me. I had not heard of this change yet. Thanks.

    Reply
  36. Yeah, this change really has problem, I think Google PR would be confusing for many of us if this change does work, hope Google does something for it.

    Reply
  37. I take it then that by using Discuss or something similar – blog comments are hosted in javascript?

    Very interesting development. I will also do the same as you and hold off on any big changes till further news and insight comes along.

    Thx!

    P.S. I left my URL out so as to save you some juice. LOL.

    Reply

Leave a Comment